Oklahoma voter irregularities discovered in Tulsa mayoral race prompting court recount challenge

TULSA, Okla. - Sept. 6, 2024 - PRLog -- In less than one day examining Oklahoma's voter rolls, Andrew Paquette found several significant issues (additional time is needed to make definitive conclusions).  In comparison, it took weeks before the first hints of voter roll algorithms were found in Ohio and New Jersey, and even longer in New York. Preliminary observations in Oklahoma:

Voter Status

The rolls downloaded 9/2/2024 appear to have no purged records. The only status conditions are "A" and "I", presumably for Active and Inactive. This suggests that instead of purging records, Oklahoma deletes invalid registrations. Deleting instead of purging may be safer for election integrity, but it also makes it more difficult to find any algorithms if present.

Voter ID

An inspection of the county and state versions of the voter rolls: At the county level, there is a single voter ID number, labeled "Voter ID". In the state rolls, a similar field is found, and no other. A comparison shows that the Voter ID in the state records matches the Voter ID number in county records. This indicates there is no separate county and state ID number as in NY, OH, and some other states. If true, this rules out the possibility of a mapping algorithm such as the one found in NY. It does not rule out the type of algorithm found in New Jersey, which does not use a county ID.

Clones

"Clone" records are records with unique ID numbers that appear assigned to voters who were assigned a different number. Because Oklahoma does not maintain purged or deleted records in their rolls, all clone records could potentially be used to double vote.

To locate clones, a match field was created by concatenating last name, first name, and date of birth. These search items are what the state of New York is supposed to use, under the law, to identify attempts at multiple registration (whether intentional or unintentional). Using this method, 7,057 potential clones were identified statewide in Oklahoma.

To expedite the examination, the number of unique ID numbers involved was not checked, but this translates to approximately 3,500 problematic registrations, or possible excess votes. Some of these are likely false positives, but in other states this is usually a small percentage of the total.

The numbers involved are small, but in a state with a relatively small population as Oklahoma (4.2 million), it is enough to affect close races where the margin of victory was less than 3,500 in state races, or less than 332 in a county like Tulsa, which has 664 possible clones, or Osage, which has 128, or about 64 potential excess votes.

Impossible registration dates

Statewide, 179,598 out of 2,381,508 (7.54%) records have a registration date earlier than the date of birth listed in the record. Either the registration or birth dates are false. False data, though common in many state voter rolls, violates HAVA (Help America Vote Act). To be fully compliant, these records must be either removed or corrected.

Scatterplots

Scatterplots can be used to quickly determine via visual examination whether numbers follow or deviate from expected values.  Preliminary Findings show that there appear to be systematic voter irregularities in the OK State Board of Elections rules administration.

Andrew Paquette has a PhD from King's College, London, for his research on the development of proficiency among digital artists. He has analyzed voter databases in New York, New Jersey, Ohio, and Oklahoma.

About God's Five Stones Foundation

God's Five Stones Foundation (https://godsfivestones.com) is a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to educating the public about threats to democracy, including election fraud and globalist agendas. Co-founded by Dr. Jerome Corsi and Dr. Karladine Graves, the foundation provides resources, support, and legal assistance to those fighting for freedom and truth.