"There Are No Survivors" President Trump Speaks on DC Plane CrashQA Expert Daryl Guberman Sends SHOCKWARE Through Aerospace After Washington D.C. Plane & Copter Crash And Sheds Light On Boeing's Self-certification And Regulatory Lapses.
By: GUBERMAN-PMC,LLC Guberman, who recently made waves by providing a deposition during a whistleblower hearing on Capitol Hill, Speaking at an April 17, 2024 Senate subcommittee meeting QA EXPERT DARYL GUBERMAN STANDS UP AT DHS SUBCOMMITTEE April 17,2024 Washington DC https://youtube.com/ Highlights how systemic failures within the FAA and Boeing's self-regulatory status are contributing to broader safety concerns within the aerospace industry. In 2009, the FAA granted Boeing the authority to self-regulate, a move Guberman argues has led to serious lapses in oversight. Following this, Guberman returned to the DHS subcommittee on June 18, 2024 where he observed Boeing CEO David Calhoun's deposition.Calhoun is an account without hands on aerospace knowledge only "number bending". "What Boeing needs isn't another dark horse—it needs a Clydesdale: strong, steady leadership that's willing to roll up their sleeves and get to work," said Guberman. He emphasized that merely rotating personnel without bringing in new perspectives won't solve the company's deep-rooted problems. "Without an outsider like myself stepping in, Boeing will continue to suffer from internal inertia." https://www.openpr.com/ Key Points: Boeing's FAA Self-Regulation (2009): In 2009, Boeing was effectively made an FAA regulator, allowing the company to oversee its own compliance with safety standards (SELF-CERTIFY their own aircraft, aircraft technologies-
The Role of ANSI, ANAB, and IAF: The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and American National Accreditation Board (ANAB), of which Boeing is a part, are crucial players in shaping industry standards. However, the dual roles played by federal agencies like the FAA in these bodies raise concerns about conflicts of interest and regulatory capture. The International Accreditation Forum (IAF) is an association of accreditation bodies both national and international, and was founded by ANSI- ANAB. IAF also has a sister organization in Australia International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation ILAC, with national and international bodies having the authority to issue certifications, including those for companies like Boeing. The interconnected roles of these organizations raise questions about the effectiveness and impartiality of the certification processes. The accreditation bodies that are on IAF & ILAC are equivalent to ANSI-ANAB. Also ANSI-ANAB are underwriters for IAF and ILAC, which means they take all systematic and product liabilities. Guberman also highlights a recent effort by ANSI-ANAB to establish a unified global accreditation entity named Global Accreditation Cooperation (GLOBAC) a unification of IAF-ILAC. He argues that this move is intended to dissolve ANSI-ANAB's liability while preserving their control over global accreditation processes. Systemic Safety Failures: Boeing's failure to obtain AS9100 certification for raises critical concerns about the company's ability to uphold its own quality standards while demanding certification from its suppliers. https://aviationweek.com/ Boeing's close relationship with ANSI-ANAB, where it holds the power to grant, suspend, and withdraw certifications, has been called into question by industry experts, including Guberman. ANSI-ANAB took down the webpage the grant, suspend, and withdraw certifications due to Gubermans exposure. He asserts that this system creates significant risks, including regulatory failures that compromise the safety of aircraft like the 737 MAX. The 2001 and 2002 Boeing Layoffs and Certification Issues: 2001: Following the September 11th attacks, Boeing announced plans to lay off 20,000 to 30,000 employees, which exacerbated issues in quality control and safety practices. https://theworldlink.com/ April 2002: Special process certification was initiated by the Performance Review Institute as an emergency measure to address the rising demand for more stringent oversight, yet inconsistencies in execution continued to surface. BOEING WEBPAGES- Mysteriously disappear due to Gubermans exposure. July 2002: A supplier bulletin was issued to address quality and compliance issues, reflecting an ongoing struggle to maintain the high standards required in aerospace manufacturing. BOEING WEBPAGES- Mysteriously disappear due to Gubermans exposure Boeings Supplier Portal: Certification Body is accredited for this quality management system by the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board (ANAB) or international equivalent; and Certificate of registration is to SAE AS 9104 and certified supplier is listed in the IAQG OASIS database and in good standing. 2018 – 2025 ANSI-ASQ TURNED TO ANSI-ANAB for 7 years Boeing never change Supplier Portal to ANSI-ANAB) BOEING WEBPAGES- Mysteriously disappear due to Gubermans exposure October 2003: Heads Up 22 procedure ANSI-ANAB implemented Online Aerospace Information Systems OASIS by the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) began, which eventually became integral in shaping how aerospace suppliers were monitored. This system is directly tied to ANSI-ANAB's oversight mechanisms. FAA's Failure to Regulate: Despite its oversight role, the FAA has been repeatedly criticized for its failure to effectively regulate Boeing and other major players in the aerospace industry. This failure has led to numerous incidents, including the crashes associated with the 737 MAX, and has prompted calls for reform within the agency. Boeing CEOs as FAA Administrators: Both Jim McNerney and Dennis Muilenburg, former Boeing CEOs, held de facto roles as FAA administrators due to Boeing's granted inspection privileges. These Boeing executives personnel were able to essentially self-certify the company's aircraft and technologies, reporting only certain items back to the FAA and limiting external oversight. This loophole in the regulatory framework allowed Boeing to bypass crucial oversight and compromises safety standards. BOEING WEBPAGES- April 2002 NADCAP SPECIAL PROCESSES PRI JULY 2002 SUPPLIER BULLETIN READER; PLEASE CLICK ON LINKS BELOW TO CONFIRM: Mysteriously Disappear "Sorry, the page you were looking for has moved or no longer exists". April 2002 NADCAP SPECIAL PROCESSES PRI https://www.boeingsuppliers.com/ JULY 2002 SUPPLIER BULLETIN https://www.boeingsuppliers.com/ Daryl Guberman Exposes Boeing's Two-Decade Quality and Accreditation Scandal https://www.prlog.org/ Guberman's Call for Change: Quality Expert Daryl Guberman: The Only Savior for Boeing's Future https://www.prlog.org/ End
Account Email Address Account Phone Number Disclaimer Report Abuse Page Updated Last on: Jan 30, 2025
|