"40+ Year QA Expert Daryl Guberman Exposes Global Accreditation Failures": Wake Up Before the Next Catastrophe""40+ Year QA Expert Daryl Guberman Exposes Global Accreditation Failures": How Conflicts of Interest and Regulatory Lapses Endanger Lives in Aerospace, Medical, Automotive, and Electronics Industries—Wake Up Before the Next Catastrophe"
By: GUBERMAN-PMC,LLC The Origins of ANSI and Its Role in Global Standard The American National Standards Institute (ANSI), established in 1918 by engineering societies and federal agencies, has played a central role in defining quality standards. By 2018, ANSI took control of the American National Accreditation Board (ANAB), consolidating its influence. Together, these organizations were instrumental in founding the International Accreditation Forum (IAF), while also underwriting certifications tied to systemic failures in industries ranging from aerospace to healthcare. Additionally, ANSI and ANAB are deeply involved with the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), a sister organization to IAF, creating a tightly integrated network with vast authority yet little accountability over global certification processes. IAF Leadership and the Role of Communist China From 2015 to 2021, Xiao Jianhua, a Chinese national with ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chaired the IAF while also leading the China National Accreditation Service (CNAS). Under Jianhua's leadership, CNAS certified critical facilities like the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) as compliant with the highest safety standards, despite U.S. concerns after meeting with Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists who reported to them "significant deficiencies in safety by not having enough trained technicians." It is apparent the Bio-Level 4 Wuhan Laboratory was issue a laboratory certification without well trained technicians. This failure was further illustrated in 2017 Pamela Sale's Deposition in Texas: Pamela Sale, Vice President of Laboratory Accreditation for ANSI-ANAB, admitted under legal deposition that laboratories lack consistent standards and protocols, further implicating ANSI-ANAB in systematic failures, including the Wuhan lab's deficiencies. She stated, "One of the issues is that there is no commonly agreed-upon set of standards that forensics labs around the country have to follow. Instead, there are informal guidelines that labs can choose to follow or not." Jianhua's position as both IAF Chair and CNAS Chief Executive highlights a glaring conflict of interest, particularly given China's National Intelligence Law article # 7 which mandates cooperation with state intelligence efforts. The resulting compromise in cybersecurity and data integrity raises significant concerns for global industries. Gain-of-Function Research: A Troubling Collaboration In March 2017, the Wuhan Institute of Virology hosted a joint U.S.-China meeting to discuss gain-of-function research. This partnership occurred under an accreditation system later criticized for its lack of rigor, raising questions about the role of ANSI, ANAB, and CNAS in facilitating risky research collaborations. Exploitation of the National Recovery Act Private entities like ANSI and ANAB have co-opted the National Recovery Act of 1935 to expand their dominance over accreditation systems. Originally designed to stimulate the economy, this legislation has instead been used to consolidate authority over regulatory frameworks without sufficient oversight. This has allowed federal agencies such as the FDA, DOJ, and Department of Commerce to sit on ANSI/ANAB boards while also serving as paying customers, creating an environment of regulatory capture. Major corporations, including Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, share these boards, further eroding the impartiality of regulatory processes. Impact on Critical Industries The conflicts of interest within these accreditation bodies have had devastating effects:
• Medical: Laboratories, including WIV, have received certifications despite significant safety lapses.
GLOBAC: A Shield for Legal Liability? The creation of GLOBAC (Global Accreditation Cooperation) Historical Parallel: The National Recovery Administration and ISO The accreditation framework mirrors the controversial practices of the National Recovery Administration (NRA) in the 1930s, which was declared unconstitutional for enabling monopolistic practices. Executives of large corporations transitioned the NRA's influence into the formation of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), creating a voluntary compliance framework used to dominate smaller businesses. Today, ANSI and ANAB perpetuate this cycle of dominance through their roles in IAF and ILAC, reinforcing a system that benefits large corporations while stifling competition and undermining quality assurance. This is illustrated within with Boeing as see here: https://www.prlog.org/ Call for Transparency and Reform The interconnected roles of ANSI, ANAB, IAF, ILAC, and CNAS demonstrate an urgent need for oversight and reform. This press release, supported by a detailed investigative booklet, calls on Congress to examine these organizations, hold them accountable, and establish transparency in global accreditation systems. REFERENCE ARTICLES: Global Accreditation Failures: Links Between China, India, and U.S. Corporations Jeopardize Public Health and Safety https://www.prlog.org/ QA Expert: Daryl Guberman Exposes Global Accreditation Loopholes: How ANSI, ANAB, IAF, ILAC, & APAC May Enable Sanction Evasion and Shield Liability https://www.prlog.org/ Department of Government Efficiency? Why QA Expert Daryl Guberman is Key to Musk & Ramaswamy's Vision for True Reform https://www.prlog.org/ Challenges for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Head of HHS: Conflict of Interest and Systemic Impotency https://www.prlog.org/ Daryl Guberman 203 556 1493 Media Contact DARYL GUBERMAN 203 556 1493 ***@yahoo.com Photos: https://www.prlog.org/ https://www.prlog.org/ https://www.prlog.org/ End
Page Updated Last on: Jan 27, 2025
|
Account Phone Number