Pompano Beach CRA Sits on Illegally Seized Lands and Fails to Provide Real Community Redevelopment

Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency still doesn't know what to do with the land it illegally seized from residents over many years - recent meetings expose the illegality and lack of planning in the original takings in Pompano Beach CRA Gate
 
Oct. 10, 2011 - PRLog -- The Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency still seems stymied about what to do with the vast amounts of prime real estate property they stole from residents over many years, and how to go about so called community redevelopment. An August 11th Pompano Forum article by Rebecca Dellagloria reported that the Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency was hosting a panel of experts from the Urban Land Institute and developers to recommend development strategies for the Hammondville Road corridor within the city’s northwest community redevelopment area and would include a public session to afford the community a chance to speak.  Unfortunately for the public, the article released the same day as the beginning of the public session, affording residents little time to make themselves heard in this latest go around. This may be just part of a larger problem, as according to many disenfranchised residents, no matter how many meetings are held over the last decade, community redevelopment has been anything but, and has hurt rather than helped the community.

The Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency may still be haunted by the fact that it had no authority to exist as an agency according to a 2007 Broward County Court ruling in the Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency v. Derriek Phillips case, when it had been taking property long before 2007 and even continues to do so since. In the ruling, Broward County Court Judge John T. Luzzo writes,

         “Broward County is a home rule charter county. Any community redevelopment powers not specifically delegated by it to the City of Pompano Beach were ‘reserved exclusively to the governing body of the county’ pursuant to section 163.410, Fla. Stats. (2005).

           Broward County, by Resolution dated October 14, 1980 ... delegated certain powers pertaining to community redevelopment to the City of Pompano Beach. This Resolution authorized the City of Pompano Beach to establish community redevelopment districts and delegated to the City of Pompano Beach the power to condemn property for these districts. Broward County did not, however, authorize the City of Pompano Beach to further delegate these powers to a Community Redevelopment Agency.  Specifically absent from Broward County’s delegation of authority to the City of Pompano Beach was the authority to create a Community Redevelopment Agency pursuant to section 163.356, Fla Stats (2005).”

Now this idea of the Pompano Beach Commission having authority to delegate a community redevelopment area, but not having the authority to create a community redevelopment agency, still seems a bit confused within the Pompano Beach city limits. First case in point is the fact that there still exists a Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency. How could that be after such a ruling where the agency was denied its petition to take Derriek Phillips’ property on the grounds that the “Petition in Eminent Domain was filed by a community redevelopment agency which was never specifically authorized by Broward County” and called “jurisdictionally defective.” How come the land seized by the unauthorized Agency was not returned, and how could the agency not only continue to exist, but continue to take other properties all the way into 2011? These questions remain unanswered in the minds of residents and the Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency has not helped to clarify the issue.

To go further, many wonder whether the Agency wishes to keep the issue very confused, for its own benefit.  The Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency recently launched a new website, http://www.pompanobeachcra.com, and in its own “About CRA” page, it seems to confuse the difference between a Community Redevelopment Agency and Community Redevelopment Area. The site reads,

"What is a CRA? A Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) is a dependent district established by City government for the purpose of carrying out redevelopment activities that include reducing or eliminating blight, improving the economic health of an area, and encouraging public and private investments in a CRA district. The CRA is governed by State Statutes, Chapter 163, Part III."

So, according to the website, an agency is a district (area). Or to be more clear, they give the definition for a community redevelopment area (district established by a city government) as the definition for the agency. This could be seen as very convenient in the face of the 2007 ruling acknowledging the authority for an area, but not for an agency. Throughout official materials, often the initials “CRA” are used interchangeably, sometimes to stand for the geographic area, and sometimes referring to the agency, and sometimes remaining unclear to which they refer.

And so what is the big deal anyway between area or agency? Well it comes down to the chain of authority from State to County to City, and to ideas of accountability of government and transparency of government.  When a City Commission (comprised of elected officials that are sworn to represent the voice of their constituency and the Constitution) creates a community redevelopment area, the commission may use the power to take lands from residents according to the law, and is accountable to the law and to the public through the public’s power to vote. However, when the commission delegates what is thought of as a very sensitive and special power to take private lands from citizens to a separate, appointed agency, then the public loses its voice as it has no power to vote for or against agency members. The lack of a check and balance of the agency by the public opens up this power to be used corruptly. City commissions also have strict regulations for conducting official business, such as Florida’s Government in the Sunshine Law, which refers to official business being conducted openly and publicly (in the sunshine), which may or may not be the case for a separate agency.

And so back to the meeting about the Hammondville Road development, what was it supposed to accomplish? Well, according to the August Pompano Forum article, the meeting is to develop a plan to “encourage retail and residential development, capital improvements, and historic preservation of the area.” The problem is, according to Florida’s eminent domain procedures, this plan was already supposed to be specified and in place, before private properties are taken. So even now in 2011 the CRA just convened another meeting to determine what it should do with properties taken years and years ago, when it should have already had plans in place long ago. So it seems the Urban Land Institute has been brought in to fix quite a mess and it remains unclear how development on these lands can even proceed without legal repercussions from disenfranchised residents that had their properties taken by an unauthorized agency. Those named to attend the redevelopment meeting were Carla Coleman, executive director of the Urban Land Institute for Southeast Florida and the Caribbean, Neisen Kasdin, former mayor of Miami Beach and vice chairman of the Miami Downtown Development Authority, Thomas R. Kohler, principal at RERC Strategic Advisors in Orlando, Bruce Terzsch, principal at RLC Architects at Boca Raton, Tony Tella, president of the Meranth Company in Deerfield Beach, Suri Yaffar, principal of Zyscovich Architects in Miami, Douette Pryce, president of Pryce Resources in Sewalls Point, and Rafael Rodon, executive vice president of Flagler Development in Coral Gables.

---

This article is a shortened and edited excerpt of the original press release to accommodate size limitations. Read the full press release at
http://www.wojspubs.com/2010/Press_files/PompanoBeachCRAR...

Get more information on Pompano Beach CRA Gate at
http://www.wojspubs.com

# # #

Fashion | Sex | Politics | Entertainment | Art | Education
The World of Jimmy Star Publications Inc is a socially conscious, vitally alive, renaissance-minded multimedia publishing house for the good times and the thinking person.
www.wojspubs.com
End
Source: » Follow
Email:***@wojspubs.com Email Verified
Zip:33304
Tags:Pompano Beach Cra, Eminent Domain, Hammondville Road, Community Redevelopment, Government, Corruption
Industry:Government, Media, Legal
Location:Ft. Lauderdale - Florida - United States
Account Email Address Verified     Account Phone Number Verified     Disclaimer     Report Abuse
Page Updated Last on: Oct 10, 2011



Like PRLog?
9K2K1K
Click to Share