Follow on Google News News By Tag Industry News News By Location Country(s) Industry News
Follow on Google News | AITO's response to the DfT's call for evidence on the ATOL implementation/funding arrangements- Dual-licensing system costs SMEs £6,300 per annum - AITO calls for airlines to contribute to repatriation costs
By: Travel PR Says Alisdair Luxmoore (Fleewinter) ”AITO members were equally clear about the inclusion of airlines in a new one-system-only licensing scheme. When airlines run into difficulties the tax-payer ends up footing the bill for repatriation and AITO members believe that airlines should contribute to this cost, as do tour operators.” Luxmoore continues: “This is a wonderful opportunity to change a system that was designed for the 1970s into one which will help small UK travel enterprises compete against growing multi-nationals; Uniquely within the industry, AITO members have provided hard figures to demonstrate the cost of operating the UK’s two-tier financial protection system. Luxmoore comments: “AITO members have quantified the cost (simply the time expended – not per seat bonding costs or APC payments) of handling two sets of licensing requirements each year if they sell both air-inclusive and surface transport-inclusive holidays: it averages out at a massive £6,300 per annum. Plainly, it does not make sense for probably hundreds of UK tour operators in total to waste such a considerable amount of cash in any economic climate, let alone the current situation.” Those who work solely with one of the two financial protection systems would thus pay approximately half of this figure, ie £3,150 per annum for their time alone. The savings if one system were instituted therefore amount to over £3,000 per annum per company or around 70p per passenger carried. In addition, AITO estimates the variable cost per passenger for protection would drop by around 20% as a result of economies of scale and increased competition in the bonding and insurance markets. This variable cost is currently £2.98 per passenger for AITO members and would therefore fall to £2.38 per passenger, saving a further 60p per passenger carried. How did AITO members calculate the costs incurred? • Each company running two licensing systems calculated the number of hours spent on both, and estimated costs according to the hourly rate of the person undertaking the work. • Also taken into account were the fixed costs involved, ie application fees. • External costs charged by accountants for checking forms, etc, were added. • AITO believes that members will have dramatically under-estimated the time and costs incurred in running two systems so the actual costs involved will be greater. • Companies operating only licensable or only non-licensable business (16% of responses) were excluded from the research, as the aim was to quantify cost savings for those operating the current two systems. While one-system companies would not benefit financially from a merged protection system, they would still welcome clarification and many will benefit from increased competition in the market from providers of financial protection. The other 84% would see substantial benefits, which would enable them to compete more fairly. AITO sees a significant benefit in separating repatriation from the financial protection system and in removing credit card merchant acquirers from it, too, thus removing so-called double bonding of tour operators at a stroke. Chair of AITO, Derek Moore, says: “I’d like to thank Alisdair Luxmoore (Fleewinter) Ends/23nd August, 2013 Note for Editors: A single licensing scheme for consumer financial protection would tie in, at long last, with the government’s stated aim under its Better Regulation Taskforce findings. For more information on AITO, visit the new website at www.aito.com. Press: For further information, or to interview Alisdair Luxmoore (Fleewinter) End
Account Email Address Account Phone Number Disclaimer Report Abuse
|
|