Biden Failed to Release COVID Origins Intelligence As Required By Law Nearly Two Years Ago; Trump Starts Process In First Week:

WASHINGTON - Jan. 28, 2025 - PRLog -- A note from the Author:

These interlocking directorates are far more numerous than one can imagine and ANSI-ANAB with our government is stacking the deck with personnel like Phillip Mattson DHS, Gordon Gillerman Department of Commerce-NIST. I think that when all of them ANSI, ANAB, IAF, ILAC, Federal Agencies and Corporations are linked, what we have amounts to a Corporate State Conspiracy to rule the entire economy, if not the entire governmental system of our country and perhaps even further than that.Hopefully this will change during the Trump administration.

A bombshell investigation reveals that President Biden failed to release intelligence on COVID-19 origins nearly two years after being required by law, while President Trump initiated the process within his first week. This delay is compounded by systemic lapses in global accreditation systems and regulatory oversight, raising serious concerns about conflicts of interest and accountability in critical certifications, including those linked to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

This press release outlines key findings that tie accreditation failures, regulatory capture, and conflicts of interest to global safety risks and compromised public trust.

Key Findings

1. Randy Dougherty's Role in Global Accreditation Failures

Randy Dougherty, in 2009-2015, served as Vice President of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI),  the American National Accreditation Board (ANAB),. He was also the Chairman and principal on the IAF 990 tax form. His involvement in critical accreditation decisions during this period has sparked significant concerns about his role in systemic failures across key certification processes, particularly in industries with high stakes such as aerospace, automotive, electronics, pharmaceuticals and other industries:

• Under Dougherty's leadership, serious questions arose about ANSI and ANAB's handling of safety certifications, especially for high-risk industries.
  
  
• Transparency lapses in certification processes have been highlighted as a significant issue, leading to concerns over the impartiality and effectiveness of global accreditation practices under his leadership.
  
  
• Cybersecurity Concerns: In 2017, Randy Dougherty was prominently advertised on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) website, while Chairman Xiao Jianhua, also sat on the IAF. This raises alarming concerns about cybersecurity vulnerabilities and the potential risks posed by the close ties between ANSI-ANAB, and key international accreditation bodies. Dougherty was advertised as the Vice President of Quality for ANSI and ANAB, increasing the possibility of undue influence over critical cybersecurity and safety protocols at a time when global accreditation systems were under scrutiny for their lack of transparency and accountability. An issue that arises from the DHS is Philip Mattson Executive Director Office Of Standards who represented DHS on the ANSI-ANAB board. Philip Mattson received $262,814 in conjunction with his Federal Salary. Mattson sat on ANSI-ANAB's board at the time Randy Doughtery was being Advertised on DHS website 2017-2018.
  
  
• Potential Improprieties with Government Advertising: Under federal law, private enterprises cannot be advertised on government agency websites, including the Department of Homeland Security. The Advertising of a private enterprise, such as ANSI and ANAB, or its leadership, on a government agency website creates an inherent conflict of interest. This could lead to questions about undue influence, lack of impartiality, and possible violations of legal standards. Government agencies must adhere to strict rules that prevent private companies from receiving preferential treatment or undue promotion, especially when it comes to certification and oversight functions. The advertising of Randy Dougherty and ANSI/ANAB on DHS's website is an example of an improper relationship that undermines public trust and the integrity of both government oversight and private sector standards.

In 2018, Randy Dougherty retired from his leadership roles at ANSI-ANAB, and the IAF. However, the damage done during his tenure continues to resonate. Particularly troubling is his decision in 2015 to hand over the IAF leadership to Xiao Jianhua, who served as Chairman from 2015–2021 and Chief Executive of the China National Accreditation Service (CNAS). This move raised serious national security concerns. Xiao Jianhua, a high-ranking official in the Chinese government, was directly responsible for certifying high-risk facilities like the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which was the subject of controversy due to its bio-safety level 4 certification despite major deficiencies in staff training and laboratory procedures.

Xiao Jianhua, also must adhere to the Chinese National Intelligence Law article 7 which mandates all Chinese nationals to take data from organizations and send it back to China. This is called hacking or cybersecurity infiltration.

Under his leadership, CNAS certified WIV for the highest bio-safety standards in 2017, despite clear deficiencies in laboratory staffing and training. The certification of the WIV has been widely criticized in light of the laboratory's connection to the global COVID-19 pandemic, which further highlights the disastrous ramifications of the IAF's compromised leadership. Dougherty's decision to allow a Chinese national with direct government ties to lead the IAF has far-reaching consequences, particularly considering the ongoing cybersecurity and safety concerns.

2. Xiao Jianhua's Role in Global Accreditation Failures

Xiao Jianhua, a prominent figure in quality oversight since 1994, served as both Chairman of the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) from 2015–2021 and Chief Executive of the China National Accreditation Service (CNAS). Under his leadership, significant lapses in accreditation integrity were exposed:

• January 2017: CNAS certified the WIV for the highest bio-safety standards despite major training deficiencies.
• 2017-2018: U.S. officials visiting the WIV uncovered safety lapses, including a lack of trained technicians essential for containment, further exposing certification failures.

Xiao Jianhua's dual leadership roles in both national (CNAS) and international (IAF) accreditation organizations highlight systemic conflicts of interest and compromised impartiality in global quality certifications.

3. Pamela Sale's Deposition on Laboratory Standards

In August 2017, Pamela Sale, Vice President of Laboratory Accreditation for ANSI-ANAB, admitted under oath in Texas that laboratories lack standardized protocols: "One of the issues is that there is no commonly agreed-upon set of standards that forensics labs around the country have to follow. Instead, there are informal guidelines that labs can choose to follow or not."

This admission implicates ANSI-ANAB in systemic deficiencies, including certifications for Bio-Level 4 labs like the WIV.

4. The Founding of IAF and U.S. Oversight

The IAF, established by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the American National Accreditation Board (ANAB), remains deeply tied to these U.S. entities. Both ANSI and ANAB act as underwriters for IAF certifications, raising questions about impartiality and accountability in global accreditation practices, further entrenching their influence and responsibility for certifications granted under these international organizations. Accreditation bodies under the IAF and ILAC are considered equivalent in accreditation authority to ANSI-ANAB, like CNAS, underscoring the interconnected nature of these organizations and the need for oversight reform.

5. Collaboration Between IAF and ILAC

The IAF collaborates with the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), based in Australia. Together, these organizations oversee certifications granted by national and international accreditation bodies. Like IAF, ILAC's accreditation bodies are considered equivalent in authority to ANSI-ANAB. This equivalency underscores the interconnected nature of these organizations and raises questions about their ability to provide independent, unbiased certification for high-stakes facilities like the WIV.

6. Gain-of-Function Research and U.S.-China Collaboration

In May 2017, the WIV hosted a U.S.-China meeting where gain-of-function research was prioritized. Despite documented training deficiencies, CNAS certifications remained unchallenged, even as risks to containment and safety escalated.

7. Regulatory Capture and Conflicts of Interest

Federal agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Commerce-NIST sit as board members of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the American National Accreditation Board (ANAB) but also play significant roles as paying customers to these organizations. This dual involvement of the DOJ, DHS, FDA, and Department of Commerce-NIST (National Institute of Standards &Technology) as both board members and financial contributors to ANSI-ANAB creates a web of conflicts of interest that undermines impartial regulatory oversight. Another conflict is Mr. Gordon Gillerman Director of Standards Coordination Office of Standards who represented NIST and paid by ANSI-ANAB $120,361 and his federal salary

This entangled relationship allows corporations, including those like Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, to exert undue influence on the decision-making processes, further exacerbating concerns about regulatory capture.

A Call to Action

This investigation reveals systemic accreditation failures and raises critical questions about the accountability of U.S. leaders, including Dr. Anthony Fauci's involvement in gain-of-function research. The delayed release of COVID origins intelligence and the safety lapses at the WIV demonstrate the urgent need for reform.

The contrasting approaches of President Trump, who initiated the release process in his first week, and President Biden's nearly two-year delay, underscore the pressing need for transparency and accountability in government and regulatory bodies.

QA Expert Daryl Guberman with 40 Years of Experience in Quality Assurance:

Daryl Guberman has been an outspoken advocate for transparency and accountability in aerospace and global certification processes. His expertise in quality systems and standards has made him a leading voice in the push for significant reforms within the industry. Guberman emphasizes the need for regulatory oversight to be free from conflicts of interest and calls for comprehensive changes to restore public trust in global safety systems.

"As someone with over 40 years of experience in quality assurance, I urge Congress and the American public to demand full transparency and significant reforms to restore public trust and ensure accountability at every level, we have the remedy," said Daryl Guberman.

On April 17, 2024, QA Expert Daryl Guberman- Said BOEING Relinquished For 22 yrs SUPPLIER Audits. https://www.newstribune.com/photos/2024/apr/18/3749044/

COVID Vaccine Makers Shielded Until 2029: QA Expert Daryl Guberman Reveals Path to Justice https://www.prlog.org/13052548-covid-vaccine-makers-shielded-until-2029-qa-expert-daryl-guberman-reveals-path-to-justice.html

"Global Accreditation Failures: How the Wuhan Lab Certification Exposed Systemic Weaknesses and Paved the Way for COVID-19" https://www.prlog.org/13057469-global-accreditation-failures-how-the-wuhan-lab-certification-exposed-systemic-weaknesses-and-paved-the-way-for-covid-19.html