OKLAHOMA CITY -
June 7, 2016 -
PRLog -- Both sides of the creation and evolution debate for example, have the same problem. For example an evolutionist can say it's delusional (a favorite resort of Richard Dawkins) or absurd to believe in an eternal God but the very same person may believe that the universe itself is eternal or that it has no end to it. If they do happen to believe there is an end to it, what would actually be at the end of it? It one says "nothing" would be at the end of the known universe, one could then reasonably ask the question as to what "nothing" is. There is no concept for "nothing" - in other words, the human mind cannot conceive of literal nothing. Darkness would not qualify and empty space would not qualify because these are things that exist (outer space has massive amounts of both). Knowing how the very start of life forms began, whether one believes they evolved over millions of years or appeared suddenly, is the "building block" - the very "foundation"
for everything that followed the appearance of physical life. … See my Amazon book on this subject, here:
https://www.amazon.com/Biblical-Earth-Creationism-Under-A...